57th World Seminar on Oral Health and Dentistry
  • Follow

Accepted Abstracts

A Comparative Study of Platelet?Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Titanium?Prepared Platelet?Rich Fibrin (T?PRF) in Patients with Endo?Perio Lesion

Kamlesh P. Talesara1, Rini G. Aroli Veetil2, Soham M. Brahmbhatt3, Mridul Sharma4, Deepika Khandelwal5, Divya Jyoti6*, Miral Mehta7

1Department of Periodontics, Yogita Dental College, Khed, Maharashtra, India,
2Periodontist, Primary Health Care Cooperation, Qatar.
3Dentist and Health Administrator, AMC Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
4Department of Smart Healthcare, Indian Institute of Technology and All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
5Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Geetanjali Dental and Research Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
6Department of Oral Health Sciences (Periodontics), Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
7Department of Pedodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Citation: Talesara KP, Veetil RG, Brahmbhatt SM, Sharma M, Khandelwal D et al (2025)  A Comparative Study of Platelet‑Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Titanium‑Prepared Platelet‑Rich Fibrin (T‑PRF) in Patients with Endo‑Perio Lesion. SciTech Central Dentistry 2024.

Received: January 04, 2025         Accepted: January 07, 2025         Published: January 07, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Association between pulp and periodontal lesion is termed as endo-perio lesion. Treatment of intra-bony defect can be done by GTR.
Methodology: The present study was conducted on 180 patients suffering from endo-perio lesion. They were divided into two groups namely the ones treated by PRF and the other one treated with T-PRF. Follow-up was taken at 3 and 6 months interval. The results thus obtained were analyzed statistically using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM. Chicago, USA) and unpaired t test. The level of implication was set less than 0.05. 
Results: Mean change in probing depth at period of 3 months in group 1 is 2-15 while after 6 months is 2.74. P value is 0.91 which is highly insignificant. Similarly relative attachment level at 3 months is 1.96 and at 6 months is 2.63. P value is 0.73.
Conclusion: No statistically significant results were observed in term of baseline attachment measurements.
Keywords: Endo‑perio lesion, protein rich platelet, T‑PRF